History-
·
45 yrs, male
·
Non smoker, non alcoholic, no addiction to
tobacco
·
Low socio economic status
·
No H/O:: loss of weight/ Appetite
·
No significant past H/O similar illness
·
No significant family history
·
Patient is vegetarian, bladder/ bowel/ sleep
habits normal
Presenting
complaints-
·
Swelling in (left )lower side of the face- 2
months
·
Loosening
of teeth (left lower jaw) – 6 weeks
H/O Present illness-
·
Swelling- 2 months
·
No H/O trauma (dentures)
·
No fever/ pain/ redness
·
No H/O contact
·
No difficulty: opening mouth
·
Difficulty in speech and chewing
·
No halitosis
·
Loosening of tooth in left lower jaw 6 weeks
back
·
Tooth extracted
·
Loosening of 2 or more adjacent teeth- 3 weeks
Metastatic history-
·
No H/O breathlessness, cough, expectoration,
haemoptysis
·
No H/O jaundice
·
No H/O of loss of consciousness, seizures
·
No H/O bone pains
Treatment history-
·
Mouth washes
·
Analgesics
·
Biopsy done 2 weeks back
Importance of
loosening of tooth- if there is loosening of tooth then involvement of
mandible occurred due to malignant tissue. If mandible is involved then whole
management plan changes accordingly. Of
course loosening of teeth is also seen in caries.
H/O contact- HPV 16-
it damages the DNA of mucosa. It takes away the protective element.
Tobacco- Nicotine-
Nitrosamine {nitrosamine produced from nicotine by action of local bacteria or
irritation}
Passive smoking-
Alcohol- it takes
away the protective lining (mucosa). Alcohol potentiates the toxicities of
tobacco. It causes mutation in the DNA lining of mucosal cells.
H/O pigmentation/ chronic ulceration/ patches-
Precancerous
condition- Leukoplakia, Erythroplakia, Submucous fibrosis, Viral Warts,
Veneral warts, hypoplastic candidiasis
H/O excessive
salivation- chronic irritation
Drooling of saliva-
if lesion is involving facial nerve then there will be asymmetry of face and
drooping of the angle of mouth. Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve
will be responsible for drooling of the saliva.
Summary {history}-
·
Any Precancerous condition
·
Any condition that predispose to oral cancer
·
Is patient a high risk case?
·
Is he suffering from something that could be
prevented before?
·
Family history
General examination-
·
Alert, conscious, co-operative
·
Sitting comfortably
·
Averagely built, averagely nourished
·
Hydration status adequate
·
Performance status- Karnofsky’s 80
·
PR-72/min, BP- 130/80mmHG
·
RR-16/min, afebrile
Nutritional status-
BMI, Mid Arm circumference, Triceps Skin fold thickness, Pallor, Pedal edema,
loss of temporal fat, bald tongue- viatamin deficiency, hydration status of the
patient,
Performance status
– Karnofsky’s
scale- patient’s
capability for fighting the disease and also co-operating with the treatment.
In
general exam in cancer dis special emphasis on-
1. Performance
status
2. Nutrition
status
3. Hydration
status
|
Local examination-
·
Inspection-
o
face is asymmetrical
o
there is visible swelling in left lower jaw
o
extending from angle of mouth to angle of
mandible
o
4cm*3cm in size
o
Surface of the swelling appear to be smooth
o
Margins appear to be well defined
o
Skin overlying swelling is normal
o
No scar mark, no pigmentation mark, no venous
prominence
·
Palpation-
o
Temperature over swelling not raised
o
Non tender
o
Hard in consistency
o
Fixed to the bone – it may be either arising
from bone or involved the bone { if fixed to the bone- staging change to T4
& it is contraindicated for radiotherapy- Radiotherapy is not recommended
why? Reason- higher doses of radiotherapy required that will produce
RADIONECROSIS OF BONE that will produce osteonecrosis and produce pathological
fracture}
Rest of the oral cavity to be examined under torchlight-
·
Mouth opening- adequate or not adequate (mouth
opening should be at least 3cm to be called as adequate)
·
Tongue protrusion- whether patient can protrude
tongue completely or is there any deviation in the tongue? ( if there is involvement of floor of mouth
then tongue protrusion would be inadequate- ankyloglossia) . if involvement of
the Hypoglossal nerve will cause deviation on the same side. Why deviate to
same
·
Angle of mouth-
·
Ulcer
·
....................................................................................................
The
Karnofsky Performance Scale Index allows patients to be classified as to their
functional impairment. This can be used to compare effectiveness of different
therapies and to assess the prognosis in individual patients. The lower the
Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses.
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS SCALE DEFINITIONS RATING (%)
CRITERIA
Able to carry on normal activity
and to work; no special care needed.
|
100
|
Normal no complaints; no evidence
of disease.
|
90
|
Able to carry on normal activity;
minor signs or symptoms of disease.
|
|
80
|
Normal activity with effort; some
signs or symptoms of disease.
|
|
Unable to work; able to live at
home and care for most personal needs; varying amount of assistance needed.
|
70
|
Cares for self; unable to carry on
normal activity or to do active work.
|
60
|
Requires occasional assistance,
but is able to care for most of his personal needs.
|
|
50
|
Requires considerable assistance
and frequent medical care.
|
|
Unable to care for self; requires
equivalent of institutional or hospital care; disease may be progressing
rapidly.
|
40
|
Disabled; requires special care
and assistance.
|
30
|
Severely disabled; hospital
admission is indicated although death not imminent.
|
|
20
|
Very sick; hospital admission
necessary; active supportive treatment necessary.
|
|
10
|
Moribund; fatal processes
progressing rapidly.
|
|
0
|
Dead
|
No comments:
Post a Comment